🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional map that could add several five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 ruling, released on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to set aside a lower court's injunction that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Court's Explanation

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the delicate balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its decision.

That lower court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters according to their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the districts created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She stated that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was crafted by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

This decision is part of a national fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican majority. Typically, redistricting occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have countered with new maps in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas AG praised the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic officials criticized the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major party election organization.

Another top House leader argued the court had yet again shredded its standing by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.