🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I think there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.